Emporia Planning Commission Recommends Zoning for a Gigawatt-Scale Data Center
The planning board sent all three proposals tied to the proposed Flint Hills Digital Campus to the City Commission — over the objections of nearly nine in ten residents who spoke.
EMPORIA, Kan. — The Emporia Planning Commission on Tuesday, June 30, took up the three data-center zoning proposals it had tabled a week earlier and recommended all of them to the full City Commission, capped by a 6-1 vote to apply a Digital Infrastructure Overlay District — a set of special zoning rules for large data centers — to the site of the proposed Flint Hills Digital Campus west of the city. The vote completed a continued public hearing that, together with a June 23 session, ran more than 10 hours across the two nights.
The board acted in three steps. It voted 7-0 to recommend the overlay's zoning text, then 4-3 to recommend rezoning roughly 1,065 acres across 11 tracts to industrial classifications — approving all 11 tracts as presented after a motion to deny the four parcels nearest existing homes failed 5-2. Finally, after the public hearing on applying the overlay to that land, it voted 6-1 to recommend approval. All three recommendations now advance to the Emporia City Commission, which holds the final vote and is expected to take up the matter July 15.
The gigawatt-scale campus, tied to a developer listed in filings as Kanza Park Place LLC, would house tens of thousands of servers for artificial-intelligence and cloud computing and consume large amounts of electricity and water. The overlay does not replace existing zoning but layers requirements on top of it: studies of traffic, noise and other impacts; a development agreement between the city and the developer; landscaped buffers near residential areas; and limits allowing backup generators only as accessory equipment. The city's planning and zoning administrator, Justin Givens, recommended approval of all three items and repeatedly stressed that the commission was building a regulatory framework, not approving any specific project — noting that without the overlay, the newly rezoned land would carry only baseline industrial protections.
The public hearing on the overlay application, which had been rescheduled from June 23, stretched more than two hours, and the testimony ran overwhelmingly against the project. Of roughly 50 residents who spoke, about 43 — nearly nine in ten — opposed it; only about four spoke in favor. Opponents warned that a hyperscale data center could draw up to five million gallons of water a day and strain the city's aging system, and drive up electricity costs, with one resident comparing the campus's roughly one-gigawatt power appetite to the 1.2 gigawatts produced by the Wolf Creek nuclear plant. Others cited noise and health effects, argued the project would deliver few permanent jobs, faulted the speed and secrecy of the process, pointed to lawsuits data-center developers have filed against small towns, and mourned the potential loss of Flint Hills prairie and farmland. Several flagged that one tract sits within about a mile of Timmerman school and the Jones Aquatic Center.
The applicant team kept a deliberately low profile. Its representative, Garrett Nordstrom of Governmental Assistance Services, a governmental consultant for the developer, gave only a brief opening statement and declined to offer a rebuttal, saying the commission had "merely enacted protections" for advanced infrastructure rather than approving a data center. The team disclosed no water use, power demand, job counts or end-user identity, even though the developer's identity had become public since the June 23 hearing. The loudest reaction of the night came when a speaker cited a KDOE radio interview in which the developer had allegedly called Emporia a "failed slaughter town."
Even the commissioners who advanced the package voiced doubts. They debated the rezoning tract by tract, with the sharpest dissent over the parcels abutting homes and the tract near the school and aquatic center; one commissioner said that land made more sense for housing, while another questioned the promised economic benefits as speculative. Members who favored moving forward argued the commission was only at "step three" of a multi-step process — that later development-agreement and planned-unit-development stages would give the city and public more chances to shape or halt the project — and that passing up a rare contiguous industrial site would leave Emporia, still reeling from the loss of its Tyson beef plant, unable to compete for major investment. The overlay before the board was a fourth draft, revised through earlier sessions to add facility-decommissioning and electronic-waste plans; some opponents ultimately urged the board to apply it anyway, as a protective floor, once the rezoning had passed.
Why it matters: Emporia is one of a growing list of Kansas towns scrambling to write rules for an unprecedented wave of data centers, and its decision is becoming a test case for how rural communities weigh a massive private investment against the strain on their power, water and land. The proposals now head to the City Commission, where residents have said they intend to keep pressing their case.
Found a mistake? Have a news tip or feedback to share? Contact our newsroom using the button below:
